Violence and the Inner-City Code
Elijah Anderson
Introduction
Interpersonal violence wreaks havoc daily on the lives of persons living in low-income, inner-city neighborhoods. Simply living in these areas places youth at risk of being socialized into aggressive behavior. Elijah Anderson describes the “code of the streets” that has emerged from interactions within these settings. This code, unfortunately, reinforces the use of violence within inner-city neighborhoods and threatens to further degrade relationships between young persons and authority figures.
Key Points
- The “code of the streets” refers to a set of informal rules guiding interpersonal behavior in inner-city neighborhoods.
- These rules prescribe proper comportment and the proper way to respond when challenged with violence or the threat of violence.
- The rules regulate the use of violence, and therefore legitimate the use of violence when the “rules dictate that violence is the proper response to a challenge.”
- The rules are established and reinforced through interpersonal contacts in everyday life.
- Everyone knows that violation of the rules will bring penalties.
- Knowledge of the code is mainly defensive; it is necessary to know the code for operating in public.
- The pervasiveness of the code, and its strict enforcement on the streets persuades even parents who reject it to encourage their children to abide by it for their protection and well-being.
- RESPECT lies at the heart of the code. One is to be treated “right” and granted the deference they deserve.
- Respect is hard-won and easily lost. It must be constantly guarded and defended.
- The rules of the street provide a code by which respect is earned, defended, and lost.
- Clothes, jewelry, gait, language, and grooming reinforce normative expectations of behavior in inner-city neighborhoods
- These rules might change by neighborhood, city, or ethnicity of the participants. But the key features of rules for earning and maintaining respect are common to the inner-city experience.
- It is important to demonstrate “nerve” on the streets. To uphold the code even when severely challenged on the street. Otherwise, one will suffer the penalties of “violation of norms” as these are dealt by those adhering to the inner-city code.
- The code exists as a subculture within inner-city neighborhoods because residents, particularly youth, feel cut-off (alienated) from mainstream society. When people have few opportunities, or perceive few opportunities to gain respect within mainstream culture, they devise a set of rules by which to earn respect outside the mainstream norms.
- The code serves as a mechanism for gaining respect for those who adhere to it. Given its separation and differences from mainstream culture, however, the act of adhering to the code ironically creates a greater separation between those who adhere to it and those who adhere to the “code” of mainstream society. This is the vicious cycle of 1) alienation from society, 2) street code behavior as a substitute for mainstream norms, 3) further separation from mainstream norms.